"Problematización ProVida" con Astrid Bennet Gutiérrez, Carlos Dulanto Sandoval y Marcial Padilla

[00:00:00] Thank you very much for joining us. Here in this session, which is a virtual panel, it's an experiment that will be used to learn from a very interesting topic that we must be able to see a lot of like, like, toxic and take our action.

[00:00:36] And sometimes, at least in our Latino countries, we are not doing so much or not as we should.

[00:00:41] So, we would be able to see three people who are doing a lot of their countries in the city, but before this is the idea that it is present, that the countries are starting to put us in the presence of God. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. Thank you.

[00:00:56] Thank you. And I hope you are happy. Amen. Lord Jesus, I want to ask you to accompany us in this session that we will have. Who will answer your spirit for the human,

[00:01:09] Master, Master, Carlos, all the Catholic miracles that are also in this moment and in this day of this imposio.

[00:01:19] We have to call it a lesson that will not be reflected, but above all, we will run things through the way to work together in this that has not been much. We have to say that we are going to be the defense of the non-acids.

[00:01:34] We have this by the intercession of our Lord, our Lord, our Lord, our Lord, the name of the Father, the Son of the Spirit, Amen.

[00:01:41] Well, before we explain that Carlos is going to be saying the session and say that it is present here in the moment, at least a minute, please. We start with with you, who is going to be doing this because you think it is here?

[00:01:56] My name is Astrid, I have been with you for 20 years with the grace of God, participating in the movement of the United States, mainly with the United States.

[00:02:08] It is also like a military center, a center of life for women who now say, in a zone that is considered the Son of the Lord, in the multipressor, is in a zone where people are under resources.

[00:02:25] So my dream is to defend life for God's sake, I love it also helping people who are starting to think about this in this struggle so that everyone can do something to defend life and that we dream and we will always be together for a short time. Marcial.

[00:03:14] We have been in the eight years, we have been working for two million of electronic racing in the world. We are not going to be able to do it. We also have a very important song. Twitter and other social networks. Our work is to articulate the social agenda

[00:03:32] so that we have a goal in the agenda. To talk with people and that we listen to the decisions between the three friends. The dignity of the person, the family, the development of society. Among these topics, you can say that the right to life,

[00:03:50] because the right to life is the right so that they can exist and be closer to everything else. I love to share the Carlos' words. I love this feeling. You have a lot of fun and a lot of fun.

[00:04:04] I love the fact that we are a little bit more experienced in the defense of life. My name is Carlos Gullanto. I am a member of the J.K. Jote, a innovation agency. I am not specifically a business, but that has created a innovation agency

[00:04:19] for the family that is called Lazaro. I have a lot of fun with the notion about the event and about walking on an objective, and in this case, the defense of life, as one of the key points, I have been a plan of

[00:04:36] Oguilby, a large agency of publicity in the world for many years, manager of two countries. It is very important to be able to see the Carlos, until Burger King, and of course, I am associated with 2013 at the Marcia for the Bien del Verú. With excellent work,

[00:04:57] we create a new strategy, we develop a different way to change the practices about everything, but it also means that they want to live independently, that they are Catholic, and we will see Marcia, the most large and panomérica, was considered the most large panomérica. In 2015,

[00:05:18] we reached more than half a million people in the country. This is what was fantastic, and we reached a first, the first goal that is one of the most important the world of the publicity, the market, the only FI, the World of the World, the first FI,

[00:05:36] the World of the World, it was not an amazing thing, because we even could take the money, the money inside the company, that helped us a lot, we couldn't take it to the office, the money was paid,

[00:05:52] and it has also helped us to have a very interesting explosion in the company. We took it to the office, we took it to the office, we took it to the office, we took it to the office, and it's really contending, that basically, the professional experience

[00:06:10] from another type, but I don't think it's the moment to let us go into these myths. Thank you very much Carlos, and now we're going to see three athletes. The microphone and the guide for us are a little bit of what will be behind this

[00:06:26] and a little bit of the methodology, and the more something. I'm here, not like an interesting topic and a developer, completely of these topics. I just just made a mistake, I think I'm the one who promised that he said it's the work of life

[00:06:47] and that he tried to do things like that, but the fear is not exactly involved in the defense of life, as I believe it should be, and more knowledge, as last week, and what's happening this week in Mexico and so many things that are happening

[00:07:04] in our country, in Latin America. So that's why I'm here, because I'm not an expert and I think most of you who are not accompanying us from all the three of us, they can identify with me, but as I can do it a lot.

[00:07:17] I've said what Carlos says, I want to be part of a topic. Not only the strategy of the march, because people who go to the march one day and the next day, they want to be a normal person. The march is one of the many actions

[00:07:32] that can't have to express and talk about it. And I'd like to leave this clear, which has a number of people who think of a way to determine, but the march is not the only problem. So the contrary, I think there's a march in a different way.

[00:07:52] For example, my friend Augusta, I like the amount of people I have in my hand. In Mexico, I say it's in Argentina. I'm very happy. I don't come to my people, but I'm not a lot of people. I like it. I like it.

[00:08:07] We're like the one who's with Andrea Conce, and as far as I know, I like the amount of people. I think there are other ways to do this kind of action-provided reaction, which is just in this moment. I'm not a panel to talk about this topic.

[00:08:26] It's already been doing something to do. So I think the march is more of a march. If you have life and thoughts on the other human being, I think we're all in the same line and can be brought up. The idea of this panel,

[00:08:41] for everyone who's understanding the problem, is the problem. What is your idea? We're always thinking, we're always trying to solve the subject of the abortion. We're really trying to solve it. It's a consequence of something. The cause of a problem. It's a consequence. Generally, other problems are obvious.

[00:09:01] But what I'm very particular about this is that if you try to solve it, it's very difficult, but it's not a standard panel, but it's not a clear idea. What is the real problem with this? We don't have a focus,

[00:09:17] and we'll all be able to try to solve it in different flanks. If you don't have a lot of flanks, it's a very good intention and a lot of love to life, but it's not a solution. Sometimes you need to do these things. But it's not a problem.

[00:09:33] There's no one in the world. There's no one in that. So it's a bit what I learned. I think it's not that. Why don't we create a panel of problem? We have to solve the three big problems that we would have to solve for the board.

[00:09:49] It's a company, for an hour or five minutes. We have a super-exigent company and a lot of business. But I think we could try to balance things. I've come from the world of innovation. I'm a specialist in innovation. And I think we could try to balance things.

[00:10:07] I've come from the world of innovation. I'm a specialist in innovation. And one of the key points is to define the problem. And here we are going to evaluate the problem from who has the problem because they are multiple actors.

[00:10:23] We have the problem from the medical point of view, from the point of view of the child, or from the woman who has that she's pregnant. We have the problem from the legal point of view. There are different actors. But I think we should first understand

[00:10:40] what the actors are, and what the most important actors are. The most important thing is that the person who has a child with him. I don't know if any of them can connect to each other, but it's a person who is violent and comes working on the subject.

[00:10:58] It's a long time ago. And we've talked about it a lot about the subject. Because many people think they don't know if they're really strong or strong. They're strong. But the topic I always see is that first woman and the woman are well.

[00:11:14] In a human being and it's not the Catholic being. It's not the woman who wants to defend both lives. And that's a key point in the discourse that we have just lived. That the life has been very long. There are no actors like that.

[00:11:32] Only the woman who defend themselves is the woman. It's the most vulnerable. But that woman is not like the woman. In some cases. Because there are more than half-served, more than half-served. And obviously, they're not like them. I think one of the key points is always to visualize

[00:11:54] the life of actors. The story of the woman like the baby. How do we go to participate? How do we develop this mechanics? In principle, I think the first thing we have to define the three main actors to know what problems we can do with these actors.

[00:12:14] Thank you. And so, what happens is we're in a moment of definitions and not because we always say that with a precision or a compensation. We're going to talk about the actors. But I think that we could also help to define the object of the conversation.

[00:12:34] We're going to say that. Because we're talking about the man. We're talking about the life of actors. To be able to be the actor. That's the key point. That's the key point. That's the key point. We're talking about the life of the actor.

[00:12:54] Before we go to the cinema. In any moment before the actors. We've never tried to make a man to make a man and his son. He's a man. He's life as a life from the conception. So, I think that there is all of us in the cinema. Exactly.

[00:13:11] And I think that here we're going to define the actors. I think we're going to do two points that we have to resolve to be able to define so that the actor doesn't exist. We have to find the main role that generates the door.

[00:13:26] Which is the problem that generates the problem we have. Okay, yes. A bit of the dynamic of this problem is, we're going to define the actor and the main role will be the first to do it. It'll be their points. From the start, Jose Manuel

[00:13:43] and the end of the show. I don't say anything about my own things. But we'll try to say what we're doing. We'll be able to do the actors and the other things. We'll be able to do the same with the other actors.

[00:13:59] The idea is that, as I said, we're going to finish with a clear problem. Maybe every one of the actors will have five problems that would be ideal. If you look at that, I think that would be a lot of help for all the people who

[00:14:14] try to solve the problem and the other thing that would be a problem is that the other thing would be a problem that would be a problem. And I think that's a very violent issue. It's another thing that makes a lot more clear about the life

[00:14:32] of a human being. If you look at that, we start with actors. It's not the thing that the actors want to be super relevant so they don't decide who we have to focus on. To solve the problem. Of course, the story is a symptom

[00:14:47] of a kind of a kind of cancer. It's a sexual reaction that can be a child as a child. We know that one person is a blessing. One is a blessing. But we are also aware that we have come to the ideas of a cultural Marxism,

[00:15:08] a sexual reaction that has attacked the family, the marriage and life. With the... Before the mentality of the conceptive that is in the body, in the same way, and where life is. So now we have the abortion that has been made for pretext

[00:15:30] because it had to have something that was not working on the conceptive. Now, there are many people who are having sexual life. It's very open and open. And I say, because I was a university student and I see how the problem is and how the problem is.

[00:15:48] And the young ones think that the conceptive will work to prevent a disease and what happens that many are in the heart and that they have never thought that we would be looking for a abortion. Many children who are looking for a abortion are trying to prove

[00:16:08] that they are sad that they are in the heart. I think that I think that a person who has been married for 20 years, should be a thing to share something. All of them hear me. It seems to me that the key to determine the abortion

[00:16:26] is a couple of things but one of the main things and the sole thing that I will say now is to vote against abortion. It's what causes many of the abortion. The women who come to our center of the country to have a lot of them are there

[00:16:50] because they recommend a doctor to recommend a social worker that has seen abortion with a solution for the social problems. There are a lot of money to the people who think that the abortion is good for the woman who is the family, who is the best

[00:17:15] and the fact that the legal abortion is what has been imposed the great numbers of abortion. The woman has been in my family who have been in the abortion and if the abortion was not legal that it is not easy to have an abortion

[00:17:30] they did not live in it. Many of them are trying to think that the pregnancy is not thinking clearly the pregnancy is very vulnerable it is more vulnerable the feelings and the fear. So, I think it is important that we vote to the favor of the life

[00:17:52] that we do not allow that a politician who does not know to distinguish between the public and serve the public as it could be. So, it is important. Number two, that all the people who say that the family should live a future of life. We must now

[00:18:14] be a child of abortion. We must be ready to animate and to help the woman pregnant we must be congruent. We do not use the alternative to use the natural and promote the social and social. We are public because the less than the communication we do not help.

[00:18:40] Please, the sexual revolution of the family. So, we must be in the same way. First, with our own life, being almost living in the city that is where a country, that is where all the young people who have to to embrace life, family, children, it is a great

[00:19:08] child, a matter to live, it is a task of the most important that there is. And the world is the country. So, the parents are also who have been taught to the children to the children to the children. And so, that is the children. To live

[00:19:34] for the children to have a one giving a semana, se puede abortar compastillas. Ahora con la pandemia se está poniendo mucho la aborto por pastilla con la telemedicina y esta también ahora en California que banda poruana ley que van a dar pasías abortivas

[00:20:00] gratis a las universitarias en todas las universidades públicas de California. Es ero perrible porque la mujer no sabe realmente lo que tiene dentro es un don muy grande. Yo quiero decir a los chicos que escuchan los jóvenes que and the need to be provided.

[00:20:17] And what is a love movement. It's to show with affection, the truth. That a baby is a blessing that a girl can be able to pursue her to study. She has her baby here in the United States. I want to see that we have graduations.

[00:20:35] This is when the girls receive her diploma. And when they get to study, she has some schools, some universities. She can't be able to graduate. She also has the baby. She also has a son and she is with a great son,

[00:20:50] because she has been able to do it because she always is good. And it's possible. So, that young people, they understand that we are not just just being the same, we are doing everything, we are helping the women. In the United States, there are 3,500 of the women

[00:21:09] in the United States, I would say one of them. The angels. This is also part of the American Red Center. I hope to help the woman, also in the United States, this is to help the mothers. And that's the answer. To vote for her not to exist.

[00:21:23] The abortion doesn't have to exist. And then with love, we have to be the truth. I have also said the women that we have, that are the best Latin and migrants, they have said that seeing a video that shows the truth of abortion.

[00:21:39] And there are several live action-tiene videos, also in this reality with the golden brown. And it's a very important video that shows the victim. Because, I hope they don't come out of the way. We have to see the victim, what happens in a certain way,

[00:21:55] that the American Red Center, the United States, we have to share with them, help the mothers to help the truth and the freedom to be born. You will see the first person who is happy, who says that this is the only one. That is, we are the two.

[00:22:13] We are the two. We are the three. We are the one who is going to be born. So there are several things here, that number one vote, that the government has been in their life, that it will be the culture of life and its rights.

[00:22:28] And also these lists for the women's help, and for the last to participate. It's very easy to participate in the group. It's simply to look for the social media, to see a set of help in the women's help. In the city of Mexico, for example,

[00:22:45] it seems that there is a human project that has the fields inside of them, they also have people who go to work and help women in front of those abortions, men, women, young men, and with the hope and the help of God,

[00:23:05] giving hope and the help of those women even in the last few years, and they will be able to do it when they are free. They are there. And it's a four-year-old woman, these girls, they are there to play with their mobile.

[00:23:21] And they have seen how they are alive. So there is no one else who, if you want to participate, you can't. There are also the churches, groups of lives that are going to be now in the city of Carística, and that they are going to be there,

[00:23:34] that they are classes at the churches of confirmation, because many, they receive the accraments, they get married, and they are going to be their life. And they have never understood what the church was going to be on the lives, on abortions or the city of cancer.

[00:23:50] We have to be in our other those voices, and they will only be saved and save others. They will give them more special. And finally, we are young people who have also who are above the people of the Holocaust, of the Holocaust, modern people.

[00:24:08] You are in your home, your mother, in this world, you have to be in the possibility to abort and not do that. Thank you, God. Now you can be with your voice, defend yourself or other people. There is no doubt that it's not because it was a friend,

[00:24:26] a sister, who was a child, but it was abort. So, you have to be in the voice, you can be in the voice. And I have 20 years in this and I don't have any day, I have never been born. All the children are born from my years,

[00:24:42] so remember to vote, live the future of life, participate in life. And that's what we have to do. And all this is what we have to do. Because the life is in a relationship, to give love and hope and the one who has loved,

[00:25:03] very little know that a great part of life is to give love and hope to the one who has loved. And the ones who have worked together in the center of abortion, are their siblings too. We received love and many of them received love, have become converted now,

[00:25:19] being fighting for life despite having had a abortion or having aborted children. That's a moment of God's love. And each day we dreamed of when abortion was illegal and unthinkable. But what I'm not to do is to get rid of it. That's an important point.

[00:25:39] There's a young man, trying to solve everything that has done to us, has a particular particular point of view with his experience and the most important thing is that in some things we did clearly have other things in the school of the kids or the house,

[00:25:56] not as much as the consequence, because if I think it's relevant that the political institutions and we fight with all the time, not to prove themselves. 100% is to be in front of our institutions, not only the ones who are not not giving away the force

[00:26:14] that we should be able to put it in front of us and there are countries that are already like a legalist or a problem in the abortion. In front of us, dimension, we say, Manuel, I think we're going to be a martial artist. I think it's extremely important

[00:26:32] because I think there are three actors and somehow they have also been the solutions. So, this is institutions and schools, which have said the political experts, as big actors, not exists in a political group, respectable, that wants to go out and we are that are formed.

[00:26:56] There is no one to go out with the way to prove it, and the first thing that's going to happen is because it's not prepared for a response to be presented. I think we're fighting and we have to do different weapons to be able

[00:27:16] to give a point of view and to be well prepared. Giving a very close man very calm, a response and sometimes there are a lot of people who are with the same guy who is in the end and they can't be able to do it,

[00:27:40] not be able to do it. Because the response of the technical team. So, the Catholic society, I think as a Catholic society, we need a refresh and we need a form of entender and we also have a conference in the background not necessarily these 20,000 things

[00:28:10] that we have in the world because the world is stressed there is a series of dynamics that we are going to do and that is a constant of medieval but it's not explained how the world works and we have to do and we have to do that.

[00:28:32] What does it mean? What does it mean? What does it mean? It's not a series of dynamics that we should do because it's a medieval point of the medieval point and so that we do not understand. We have a political institution and the other topic

[00:28:54] that is, we are going to talk about participation this Catholic and the whole thing but it's a experience because if I did and there was a little of the discordance I think it's important to be able to do that in the next time.

[00:29:16] It's not the point of view of communication. Because we do not want to see that. So, what happens? Everything that comes from evidence that has a relationship with something that is dead because people want to die with that. And they can't do that. And they can't do that.

[00:29:40] A gender-religion of George Floyd, a American man where the official he put the rodilla in the tail. And it's clear. And the people say what is being participating in the Black Lives Matter. Yes. And the 15th also went through some images of the death

[00:30:04] that were going to be a part of the death. So, what do you allow us to accept? And we use the intelligent intelligence. We see that if you help. Exactly. That's not to see. There are channels to show that kind of communication. We see. Yes.

[00:30:30] But I'm not saying that the question of the discrimination against the children before that. Yes. Because it is the actor of the object of the study of this conversation. The difference between a and a voice, in the voice or not, it's simply a problem.

[00:30:58] The problem of the death. It's to be the human life. That's the problem. The most motives that are trying to solve the death. But the problem of the death is to avoid the life. And that's the problem of the death. We're not talking about the power of

[00:31:22] the nature of a non-dead. We're talking about eliminating human life. In other moments not, because we're talking about the most protection of the juridical. It's a serious matter of the national movement. It's a serious matter. The protection of the life. A human being. The moment of the birth,

[00:31:54] the moment of the infant. The law of the protection that is received before birth. So, in the opinion, the main principle of the death of the death of the child. And all the solutions in my opinion, will have to be in the place that it's not the life

[00:32:16] that the life of a human being. In other words, why can't you say that? So, there are the actors related to the life. The circumstances, the life of the child, the life of the child, but the right to the left. It's to be used

[00:32:38] to serve the children with and discriminating. That's what I think with that, this is a lot of things that are also made of astrid. It's only to close some interesting ideas. It's totally with a person. What is the real problem? There's a fact that has the possibility

[00:33:04] to think if it was to live in a human being. In this case, we live in a child. We live in a life. Now, this has to be clear. We don't have to judge a woman who is like being living in a human being. It can be

[00:33:27] based on the case that is a possibility. Why? Because it's the violator because it's supreme because it's a normal man. Because it's not a statistic. The actors are much more vulnerable. We don't have a chance. Although it's not a time that exists in the situation.

[00:33:56] But the fact of thinking that it's a possibility is the problem. If we attack we think we're still trying to act. But I think it's good to talk about the conversation. And there are different points. The ways like it should be what can't be done

[00:34:12] or the life of a child. It's an important private child. I think when there's a child in the future of a mother the possibility exists. It's about depending on what the mother thinks at that moment. What is the reason of the measures of the possibilities and the fact

[00:34:34] and the fact that they have the way to realize this thought. That's obvious. And it's also that there are more communication, there are more flexibility. We're in the internal, a mother, a child, who thinks that as a possibility. We have access and it's going to be much easier

[00:34:57] than it is. There's no more to think about it until someone says it's much more access to that. If I think it's important to focus on this point. It's good to think how we avoid a way that exists. There are several interesting points because the first is in

[00:35:23] how a number is not said. The point is that. How the people are talking about the quality. We will not talk about solutions. That's another issue. But we can solve the key to the quality. There is a responsibility for the family. Because it's that the state is not

[00:35:55] approved the government has been approved but there is not a legal law but there is a legal law. But there is not a law. There is a law. There is a law. If the government is not the government is a organization. There is a person. I would be

[00:36:49] a person. I would be a person. I would be a person. And I would also have been a person. I would be a person. I would be a person. I would be a person But if I put it in the line, I already didn't impact it.

[00:37:32] The first time I did the second of the line, I didn't impact it. So, as a communication team, I ended up doing a very short class and I didn't allow myself to change a behavior at the time.

[00:37:42] So, I would have to refer a little bit to what I mentioned earlier. But I would want to open this possibility that other problems are from the actors to the possibility of getting the life to a child exist.

[00:37:56] Politically speaking, I think we would have to have a single one, a way of understanding, of the subject, is a completely complicated topic because there are many interests there. I would use it in the actor who takes the child's life,

[00:38:15] not in the families, who I think is where we could work differently. Because there are also institutions that put a law or permit, but people do not do it. And not for the law, that would be ideal.

[00:38:29] We would say that despite this promoting and we lose that struggle, or that battle, people do not do it. I think it would be the great ideal in terms of the province. What happens with the families?

[00:38:43] What problems are we against in the families that could promote this possibility? It's true. If not, if not, if not, if not, if not, if not, if not, if not, if not, or... Well, it seems that the problem is something that always goes to reduce the invisibilisation. Yes.

[00:39:01] There are ways of invisibilisation and there are ways of invisibilisation. We have the time to comment on the issues in reality that we have to see with how we are visualised. Can you see that the agreement is shown in the background? But...

[00:39:15] If I use this expression, if I use this expression, if someone tells me, my body is my decision. And I respond, no, no, no, no, it's your body, it's your son's body. And if your body would die, and he would call his son, he would not die.

[00:39:37] There I am, and I am civilised, I say. And putting all the actors, well, both the actors, the father and the father. This expression that I have said, has more than 700,000 reproductions in the sense. So there are ways...

[00:39:56] I think the nucleus will always be visible and the truth that there is a correspondence of all actors, and I respect the fact that the human life is human, has equivalence with any other human. And therefore my responsibility, ethical, family, economic,

[00:40:27] has to be equivalent to what I would ask in any other moment. There is power of expressions we see in the two lives, because it is very powerful, because it is visible, the equivalence, right? It is my opinion. I say it, also in my opinion, that experience,

[00:40:48] the experience, the appendix, we are not in a peer, we are in a peer with a client. I am not in a peer, I am not in a peer, but I am in a peer but if the appendix does not have a peer, I call attention as narratives

[00:41:06] and they are taking a situation where the unconditionality of the right to life. It is not that I have to be expected or not expected, if it is expected, I say, it is not that it is a circumstances, but for the effects,

[00:41:26] it is not that I have less than the right to life, before, because, if you are a scan, it is exactly the same as a human being, it is expected. It was going to be possible to say that the union of a person, it is the same.

[00:41:44] It is more, a little bit of the life of the mother, if it is adolescent, it is perfect, the child is friends. The others are the elements where we have to accompany, responsibly, to all those things, children, their mother, the father, the grandparents, the society, but the individual,

[00:42:10] the visibility, the visibility, the discrimination, and the non-violence, the respect of that child. The non-violence is important, because we enter a situation of power, or I can talk about it, that we are very sensitive in the topic of racism, it seems that it could be

[00:42:30] because you do not bring a little narrative, the logic of racism is that you are my right or I have to be on you, we are talking about the board, too. You are my right. If you are my right, I find what you exist,

[00:42:48] or what you have exist, that is what you could say. I have said this, I think there are very interesting points that are confused, that I have been told, I am very familiar, I am very familiar, I am very familiar, precisely this company,

[00:43:05] and I also have a chance to talk about how the government is doing, precisely for the death of the board, that I do not know, I do not know, and I think the point of view is communication. Here, here, I think we are reaching a point

[00:43:15] one of the main problems that we have is that we are not knowing how to communicate this popularity, this postura, and we are sometimes to limit this mirage that has from the other side, which I think, sincerely, one of the points of view of communication is that.

[00:43:36] When we start to see how enemy is there, because it thinks differently, we are very bad. I mean, suddenly we do not know what there is behind that cap of the person who took a decision of the board, but they are perhaps so beautiful

[00:43:49] that also has to be, there are people who have been lucky, but there is to support the people who have been lucky, because it is not something psychologically speaking that is going to be to be dark, or that is what is there. And this is the word

[00:44:01] that also is called the accompaniment, right? The fact of to talk about to listen to it, the problem and to see and to see it is visible that it is not a problem, as you said, it is not that it is a red carpet, it is a problem

[00:44:22] or a constant of both. Yes, or so much, the woman, the circumstances that are in the opposite or not, because it also puts her life to the board. Let's go. We even want to go to the library or not to the library and the same

[00:44:39] is putting the life of the woman when she decides to to board. I think we have not been able if that is one of the main problems and I think in this we are coinciding that we have not communicated to be the woman. We did not know

[00:44:52] to say, it is not that I am asking me, it is not that I am asking for the mother or the woman, if not I am trying to do that, I would like to balance this situation that it is not a miracle, where

[00:45:07] what I want to say is that two are victims that we see or two are so important, the two lives are going to be like not certain and what there is a post. Because another problem that the adults are going to the table, we have seen

[00:45:25] a communication problem, the same as the Catholic Church, not without the law for the judge, the court, the church, the church, the church, the church, the church, the church, the church, the church, the church and we are going to tell that nothing said that sure

[00:45:56] that there are no words. If a child who never saw the things we would do that they took more than Yes. Yes. I think as an example, this is problematic, but it's true. Yes. I mean, you're supposed to be a peorar, right? Exactly.

[00:46:21] We're not the ones who are totally ill. But there are reasons to be in that. The ability to be. Normally, the abortos were because children were not taken and they didn't have resources for them.

[00:46:34] And today the mother or their father or child, who are not taking this situation, because it has a economic difficulty for probably. But if we don't communicate with the government, there are places where they also give the hand.

[00:46:49] One of the things I've seen is that it doesn't only have this accompaniment, which is a post that is the post of the situation, where there is no use of a network of characteristics. We can't say that there is no one who is... that has a good impact.

[00:47:07] That is a girl who is isolated and who is in the same way that we call a network. Okay? Putting ourselves in your shoes, probably the family doesn't have to be careful, because there is nothing in the family. The couple who had to be able to...

[00:47:21] Anyway, let's go. We can tell you the consequences of these losses. What I could say is that sometimes we say no to the doors and we don't think we are in our house and we live in our life. Why not? We have the problem. It's not our problem.

[00:47:35] We don't buy the plate. Okay? If I remember there are institutions and it doesn't communicate and it doesn't support us and it doesn't help us to discuss this... What does it say? Hey, this is a funny thing. You have this problem. I have no doors.

[00:47:50] I mean, no doors. We will help you in the process. That you were studying, we helped you with your studies. You were working with your students. We helped you with your work. You have the job. You have the doctor here.

[00:48:04] And there are places where we don't have a house. That you see these girls in the process of the disease. Because they have all the problems. They have the same family, the same society. And they don't have that part. That's why we see it.

[00:48:24] I want to thank you for the help of the students. I work for 20 years with the people with the most difficult and difficult things. And my great friends, women who are obviously in the front of the Mexico-Gatella, come to the girls' homes. They come to the women's homes.

[00:48:41] I work with the most extreme cases of poverty. You have a thing. They have to be treated as a home. We have almost 20 years of time. When we ask the woman to be the key for the children to be a woman with that trauma. The child.

[00:49:02] The children, the women's homes, who come here and take care of their children. They are terrible situations. What they do is the response to an anime is the love of the child who received. The girl's love is the love of the woman who received.

[00:49:23] But they are not the men. We give them the help of the whole family. The love of the woman who received. They understand that they are a family. And they are a family. They are a family. They are a family. They are a family. They are a family.

[00:49:47] And they were not. They have the new job. They prepare to get the job. The models make mistakes and often becomes the objective. The people of the women are the most important to us. I have to work with the girls. The job is to get the job.

[00:50:09] It's just a job. It's a privilege. And for me, it's important that the family, the parents of the family, they have to understand their father's father's values, their values, their true true values, their true words, their true values in the place of the parents and the parents

[00:50:30] can be much more powerful for children to understand them because they should always defend themselves in the country. And starting with, to remember that we express our true true values in the Latin community, sometimes we talk about the mother's mother's mother's mother and she's talking about 7.

[00:50:53] She's talking about the father's mother's mother, we talk about the perspective of the brothers and how to do it, or the criticism that the children of the children grow, and they will also receive this critical or

[00:51:11] they will see that if they have a military in the United States, if their parents are aggressive, they know that they can bring that militia in the United States with their parents and they will receive a good advice. All the government's health, the labor,

[00:51:25] in the control of the nation, they reduce the cost. A single government is not the government is the government's government. They have been a human. And if it is a human, they will be killed. All the government's health, the population, poverty,

[00:51:46] the government, all the government is the same. And you can also explain the children that there is only five different differences between a city and a national person. The level of the population, the place, this year, the level of the population. They are the same as the SLAD.

[00:52:17] This year, the level of the development is the place and the third, because the fourth of the majority are little. It is different because this is a place between less urban and big. A fact, it is only the size of the level of the child in the future,

[00:52:51] as a student, as a student. It is simply a stage of a human but the human starts in the conception of the whole genetic information, a human being unique. So, explain the children. That is true. The father can be very much. It also includes a video

[00:53:12] of the abortion. It is very much children learn how to understand how to raise the abortion and see that the parents participate in the poverty, that the parents are people who are people who participate in the poverty, that they are committed. That is a lot for children

[00:53:32] who grow with their values and that instead have been trained in the university of school. I am a leader who is convinced to accompany. I want to say that I have seen this and I will be able to see how much the education is. I am already saying

[00:53:56] for a long time that I am not interested in the child. But I don't know if we can see a little as an older child. This is a mixture of ancient scientists that culminates with what is different. It's the path of the ideology, which is the end.

[00:54:23] It's already 300 years old. And this is the only medium-sized, two scientific scientists and many governments who use this mentality in the case of the subject that is not life before being born. The true true true, for the Spanish to be born.

[00:54:42] So, as it is, I think it's already been a few weeks. And we are, when they start, they don't know how many times they have said to Marshal Batimismo, retrograde, fanatic religious religious religious. When it's a science topic, but the Church, that's true, the Church, that's science.

[00:55:01] And I think it's actor who has always put all the levels of the other actors and even our families and others, have a way to be able to see the TV, and we're going to be able to see it and be normalised.

[00:55:13] Many of these things happen in social networks, and they go to a more approved March, and the friendship of your friends, although they are already a more conservative, a country-concerning country. The friendship of your friends is a real, so panatic religious, etc., etc., and that's my thing.

[00:55:29] It's more difficult than the problems, but it's harder to remove because it's all sides. and it's actor, who is being the main, which is obviously the character, right? And the mother, right? But I'm really sorry, but I'm not going to talk about it anymore.

[00:55:45] But I want to talk about something, because I want... It's important to talk about the four different things. To talk about all the different things. To the other. In the United States and the United States, in the year, the level of dependency, depends on the level of development.

[00:56:06] Yes, there are four. For what I have in the world, because it's my life, and I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I've also tried to say, I mean, I'm also talking about this at the moment of these days. I'm going to comment down below, maybe some ideas or actors

[00:56:21] who are also doing these particular things, or the best, not so particular things that come in their circle, or simply that come reality, in which there are no enemies, or in our final. And we're here, and there are three different countries, We are and those who are not,

[00:56:37] well, we are not, but at least 40 countries are different than those who are still there. There are also some particular factors for each moment in the identification of the problems. I mean, what I came up with is saying, thank you, Marcía, Astrid, and you have different points.

[00:56:57] I think that the idea of ​​the day in the sea when the main priority is that this is the individuality of what is going on here. The main problem is that it is going to be a human being. How do we define a human being?

[00:57:12] That is a topic that we want to enter in the work. And where we have not entered much, we have entered these discussions, entering in a territory where they were better in the definition of communication. I think one of the main problems

[00:57:29] is that the communication we have had. And I was, I was talking about the fact that Astrid, with respect to these levels, but I would like to be an interesting moment. How to educate the child about life, really, to see. The consequence of the mental illness

[00:57:45] we have to mitigate them. What exists today and are the symptoms that have been formed and have heard and are already with a conscience of some kind of international or a way to open the eyes with a good communication and support and a partner.

[00:58:02] But the great work we have to do and I think it is not that we are doing is the education of the child. We have the new generation about what life really means, the concept of life, because sometimes they come in and say,

[00:58:19] how does a life look like? We start badly. Or maybe maybe, maybe, to talk about things, because if we come to a very metaphor and finish staying at the importance to what is really a man in the living, is what is the meaning of life.

[00:58:44] I think there is the science here, we must help many, we must invest much, to the medical and scientific medical, to talk about things that we could do, as a way of doing physical and physical research, to make it accessible to what we are not medical.

[00:59:07] I am certain to be able to defend the past, we have not been able to think about what we are in this room when we say we are invited, we see each other in your name, your wife, your husband, all your rights and others,

[00:59:18] and you are not a subject because you are not really, I have to be a woman. I want to be a woman who is a woman who is a king who has all the opportunities and that nothing happens and that it can be logical and that everything

[00:59:34] is the woman. But it is true that we feel as attacked or as we look at as if we live in this world as if we are not to be a woman. I like the word I like the invisibility that is the mother of the body. Because

[00:59:56] it is visible to something through a different different discourse, a new one. It is like we say it is being placed in an image or not of a new body. The way as you can see, but I think the work is not to be prepared for the situation.

[01:00:16] I believe that we are trying to continue to show what we are doing for a master of what we are as a catalyze. We are a creature because we do this because we do that but we do not believe that we don't know

[01:00:40] to listen to some kind of debate, debate is not to be asked. That is, all debate is in the inter-community and in the search of solutions with junta. I know friends who are lamentable, lamentable, because I am a really different friend of mine. What is your favorite?

[01:01:04] I do not leave it to me, I do not leave it to me, I do not leave it to my brother or a family that we have, I think there is something different in us. I think there is to have the hard-working, because that is the city,

[01:01:17] this invisibility, because we have not been able to analyze it. If I also say what I said, I do not have the ideology, I determine, taking the step into the part of science, where I think we are not in a sense

[01:01:33] that is to say that in that point in that point, to be a promoted investigation of the debate of people who know them. So it's been a long time since I saw the problem, well, let's see if we can solve the problem. How do we solve it?

[01:01:48] We avoid the dialogues. Here, you can tell us that it's the one by 100 of the abortions. So, the problem is not the main problem. And by the way, Marcial says, today the main problem is the invisibility and this option of removing the life of the people

[01:02:05] where we will already get to go and even to the other strategies, totally different, with the political respect. So, there is no way to go to the market so that the political people have a lot of people who are not happy that they can't come out,

[01:02:19] but the strategy would be to do another. If the strategies would be to be also to form a political possible that they have scientific activities and that they can make evidence without having to enter debates, where we have more prepared because they didn't form the people.

[01:02:35] I don't know if you were in your country, but here we had political issues with very good people, but very bad in the middle of the media because they were missing things that were not valid, that they had the language, and that it was Wikipedia,

[01:02:53] and that the end of my name is generating much more controversy than a solution. I don't know if they have more ideas, because I think the people would like to start a video and make sure we're talking about it.

[01:03:10] But I don't know if we can be close to it. I particularly say, I see some lines that each of you says I love the theme of the visualization. That's right. We can see it as we can. But we can see it. It's good because... Because it's just...

[01:03:32] That's what I'm asking myself. The word is to remove the language using the word to remove its language. That's the word. Because the word you want to remove the language is not the right word. Here in the news, this word is the word. And there's no right word.

[01:03:49] There's no right word. The word is to direct the woman or to get the taxes. But the word is a great business. Oh, let's go to see if you want to use it for that business. So the word is a great business. It's a discrimination.

[01:04:14] It's a message of respect. Respect as a father's respect. Not discriminates because it can't discriminate or origin because the word is a discrimination. It's a discrimination because it's a discrimination because it's a discrimination because it's a discrimination because it's a discrimination because it's a discrimination.

[01:04:33] It's because the only thing you have to do and the truth is that it's a kind of primary word. It's at that moment when you get an individual of the same language. The most individual of the human being

[01:04:42] is there in the moment when the word is a law or a human subject, a genetic subject, or a phenomenon, or a phenomenon. And it's already like that. But we say it in easy. When you put the word in the word, you have to go.

[01:04:55] You have to go to the concept of the word. Now it's easy. It's easy. So we're here with a justice. We're here with a discrimination. We're here with a justice case. It's also visible to the mother and child but not to mention that's the point.

[01:05:16] It's according to the law, it's already seen the Schindler list at the moment. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. Now I have to go further. Yes, Schindler, with his life. He was buying lives but his life is not going. Here we are not buying lives

[01:05:32] putting them in the expense of expenses. Well, that's not what I want to say but what we don't believe is that we don't believe in a system that finally makes me think that your life is my right and that you would have to show me

[01:05:51] that I have to forgive the life. I don't have to show you anything else. We have to respect you. Exactly. Exactly. Totally, totally. Totally. I think the point is that a man in which he is the most important is a life that has another. Yes.

[01:06:08] And he has to be a detective who doesn't have to fight against the woman. That's what they want, what they want in many of the things that are behind this great business. And we have changed the discourse that the mental mental is not buying. Okay?

[01:06:24] Why did I have that? I have that. There are many psycho platforms but the truth is that the things we don't find in the other life if we are not trying to keep them I think that's the great work that we are not doing

[01:06:40] the great work of communication that we are not doing and independent of the great actions such as the ones that have the strict and their hands in which they accompany, in which they love, in which they give them that need of their emotions to the women.

[01:06:56] I think the most important thing is just to develop at any moment, or who says, because I think that none of the things I say is that the most important thing is that the baby, or that the baby is the most important thing that the mother is here

[01:07:14] who is talking about the balance of a life. It is not important. It is the same when we read the real world, we would say, this physical thing that we have, when we are passing by with COVID, people from 60 years are seeing their own 30. And of course,

[01:07:32] they are saying, well, the fact that we can't, because the 60 years of the 60 years of the total or the age of 30, we say, it is a topic that, in some way, it is flexible. It is a very liquid. So, it is flexible. So, I think

[01:07:56] we have a great work. I was thinking a little that there is to join I think for to look for the solutions that the campaign is identified. The great problem that we have is that among the own provinces, we do not count. We are very few

[01:08:16] of what we try to join a little and try to join resources to look for the ways to work a unified campaign. In other words, communication. And experts who have 20 years of age, and in the commercial, working on the field, or in the field. I don't know how

[01:08:37] it is not used and saying, well, that is also good. I do not want to leave nothing but we have to take actions important. The children listen to a speech in which they are not attacking the children. It is very important to say, the decision

[01:09:07] probably the majority of the adults do not have a relationship. That is evident that with the relationship is a very particular topic and there is to generate some solutions but if it is 1% or if it is 1% or if it is not that we do not have to

[01:09:26] to see what to teach the children to the people and young children that this is a that they have not to be a single person. I do not know because I do not like the human being. But you have to have a moral and economic and spiritual experience

[01:09:55] to take a decision and to be responsible. And I think that we have also been in the time of education. I do not know the ability to teach the children and to be responsible. I think there is the child who is not in the dream.

[01:10:19] So you can have clarity and if you are going to do to take a decision and to be responsible to the children. The generation and the children and the children. This generation cannot be a logical and logical and logical. But it has to be with the human being

[01:10:48] with the human being. Now the child and the child who are the children. So we are the children. They are the children. What is a And in the age of the capacity, you can talk about all the problems with the disease, with the disease, the sexual transmission,

[01:11:33] all those things. That's because they think they're invincible. They think they never get mad. The way they get to the capacity is that I have a positive vision. I say not now, because I say yes for a spouse or a child. If all this, a matter of comfort,

[01:11:54] if I say yes to something, because I love it, for a person to give this great gift, or if the children have to listen to it positive, they have a vision. They get mad. Apart from everything, it's also important to them, those and statistics,

[01:12:10] but we understand that we have to talk about it. With the best quality we give, we enter debate, all the logic, all the data, all the science, we understand that to reach the university, we have to tell stories. We have to discuss it. We have to understand that

[01:12:31] we can reach the logic we can take a family that is free. Yes, definitely, definitely because, besides, I think it's a storytelling for life. No, it's, there are thousands of stories of stories. No, and a story, no one will be free, no one will be free,

[01:12:52] it's a good story. And I think it's vital that we start to analyze the baby that the theme of the past, the person who, who, with many joy, can be said, I'm almost almost and almost 20 years old, I'm almost 29 years old. I don't ask myself, at the moment,

[01:13:11] I decide, when I was in the first place, I said, no, no, I can be a thousand things, I can be in an operation, I can be proud because the study of someone, I mean, I don't know how easy it is or the process of the past,

[01:13:24] the process of the past, is complex, but there is something very interesting. You have to say, I said, someone who has lived it. No, but today, how do you compare if you are one person, no, oh, and what? You don't have to say, how it works,

[01:13:43] and what is going to be discovered in the path is that you are going to do more more fundamental we are facing the sexual issue, no? And that's what I think is wonderful, no, discover a single single one, is also spectacular, no, the behind of this

[01:14:10] guard for someone, I mean, it is also important. But there is to explain the very romanticism, with the industry in the subject of emotion, but one thing is romanticism, pure and another thing is to play with emotions, develop a positive emotion and do what they see

[01:14:29] and what they analyze. If we do it very romantic, it will think that it is a novel and it is not a reality and the truth is not easy, it is not easy, it is not that we are going to do that. I am almost done,

[01:14:39] no, I have to have a process to help them to make these things like the past, should be a normal to create a creative function as we should work together. My ideas to be able to get and I think it is very good in the subject.

[01:14:56] I want to make a great conclusion, first of all, because I want to open the head despite one of my own and I always talk to people more intelligent than one and I am much more experienced, not visible humanisation as we are emotional with the guys

[01:15:17] to accompany the mother of the debate, not to read a capacity to listen to openly, including what we are not to know why it is not true. And the other thing is that we are not to be able to be able to listen to the children

[01:15:39] and to be able to change the children's control and to be able to change the children's control. And if you are in politics, I want to change the control to be able to be able to change as a fanatic. There are many people who are not fanatic,

[01:16:08] including the debate and not necessarily we are aware of some things but that is not what we want to say that we are fanatic and that we are not building ourselves, we are building something good in a way, I would like to see the society,

[01:16:30] not necessarily the children and not the disability of the Catholic. Yes, thank you. And I am in this subject and in the sexuality, I would think of what the same as the reaction to the respect. For example, if I say something, I do not agree with it.

[01:16:50] My family says that I will be able to talk to all the Americans. But I will not respect another human being before and after and then I will be able to say a reference. Yes, I think that there are only how to give the second to recognize

[01:17:16] what is a where or not because there is always talking about what is a human being. There is a being that is a human being. There is something human being. There is something totally human being and a responsibility. The respect is a responsibility. The discrimination.

[01:17:48] The responsibility of all is a Catholic. Of course, there is that now but we also talk about it. We talk about what is a human being and with arguments. There was a an adolescent. I told myself that your religion and the religion, the books in

[01:18:18] the books in the religion, the books in the the books in the Vatican. You have to respect the human being. I told myself, but I do not know where we are we are discussing and participating in something that is a human being. I do not know what

[01:18:50] is a thing. I do not know what is a thing. I do not know what is a responsibility. I do not know what is a responsibility that we have actors, people, who are not going to start criticizing the process in which we live in some way.

[01:19:40] I think there is a difference. There is a difference. There is a difference precisely of the evidence. I do not know what is a human being. I help that the contexts are not very grateful to me. I do not know what I do not know what

[01:20:16] I do not know what I do not know what I do not know what I do not know what can you do not know what can you know what you do not know and we are also curious how we are going to be able to help them too.

[01:20:59] And you are your family. Thank you very much for your support, so you can be happy. It's impossible to take out virtual services, but the services are not going to be virtual, right? But the... The... The share that we do a lot of,

[01:21:35] it's also not because it's all all the ways to form it, but sometimes one of things like that, and as I said, I don't think it was just a little bit the most important thing in the statement or the final in the game,

[01:21:47] when you're going to inform the things or in the Chévez, or in the Vino Valu, we're going to do these things like Catholics, So, activities, socials, but Catholic, and, in the end, with all this, what we have called

[01:21:59] as Catholic, that is to defend life, or to connect to the titles. And, well, it was a lot of thank Carlos, Carlos, your interesting, this dynamic, we say, being in the entire organization and, well, we are going to the conference of God of God of God.

[01:22:18] Thank you, thank you, thank you, Marciali Carlos and, well, all of us who are here, here we are going to be taking this day to comment on any questions, answer some questions and, well, we are going to defend life, from where we are. God of God of God.

[01:22:34] Thank you very much. Thank you.